Pay of Australian university heads called into question after UK protest | Australia news

University of Bath vice-chancellor’s salary found to be only half of Australia’s highest-paid equivalent

Education minister Simon Birmingham






Australian education minister Simon Birmingham says universities should reconsider the pay packets of their senior executives.
Photograph: Mike Bowers for the Guardian

Australians should question how much university vice-chancellors earn, the education minister has declared, after the UK’s University of Bath forced out its own vice-chancellor over an “outrageous” salary that was only half that of Australia’s highest-paid equivalent.

Simon Birmingham said on Thursday that universities should reconsider the pay packets of their senior executives, some of whom earn more than a million dollars a year in salary and accommodation benefits.

On Wednesday, the University of Bath in the UK demanded the resignation of its vice-chancellor, Dame Glynis Breakwell. Her salary of £468,000 a year ($812,500) led to a national conversation and drove students to the streets in protest.

But in Australia, Breakwell’s pay packet – which was Britain’s largest – would be Australia’s 28th highest, and half of what the vice-chancellor of the University of Sydney earns after benefits are added.

According to the Australian, 12 vice-chancellors in Australia took home more than a million dollars in 2016, and the University of Sydney’s Michael Spence nearly doubled Breakwell’s total pay at $1.44m.

Breakwell was paid less than UNSW’s Ian Jacobs ($1.25m) and the Australian Catholic University’s Greg Craven ($1.24m), among others. The vice-chancellor of Oxford, Louise Richardson, made even less at £350,000 ($600,000), putting her below the heads of Newcastle University, James Cook University, and the University of Southern Queensland.

Birmingham said the international comparison should prompt taxpayers to ask if they were “getting value for money”.

“While Australians recognise the high level of skills needed to run a university, many taxpayers would question why remuneration should exceed global benchmarks.”

Birmingham has previously called for vice-chancellors’ salaries and university marketing budgets to be slashed, and the funds reinvested in student places.

Vice-chancellor salaries are set by each university’s board or senate without government input.

The president of the National Tertiary Education Union, Jeannie Rea, said the salaries were “extremely embarrassing” and “out of proportion”.

“Our public university system is world class, praised by international commentators … but some of the vice-chancellors could be making more in a week than a casual academic makes in a year,” she said.

“It used to be the case that a vice-chancellor would be paid some proportion, or related to that of a senior professor, plus some. They saw themselves as leaders of an academic institution, now they see themselves as CEOs.”

Belinda Robinson, the chief executive of Universities Australia, said the minister’s attack on salary was an attempt to distract from the government’s recent $2.2bn cuts to university funding.

“This distraction strategy will not hoodwink the community,” she said.

Rea agreed: “It’s somewhat flippant to say you can redistribute vice-chancellor’s salary and be able to pay for a whole lot of things. The underfunding of university places is a much bigger problem than that.”

Guardian Australia contacted several universities about the salaries of vice-chancellors.

The ACU’s deputy vice-chancellor, Stephen Weller, said Craven’s salary included the accommodation costs of managing a national, multi-campus university.

“Vice-chancellors oversee complex multimillion-dollar organisations with thousands of staff. Their salaries are commensurate with some very senior heads of public enterprises and are less than the salaries for Australian CEOs who run similarly-sized organisations,” he said.

The University of Sydney, UNSW and the University of Queensland similarly said the million-dollar sums included superannuation and a housing allowance.

A spokesman for the University of Queensland, whose vice-chancellor Peter Høj earns $1.15m a year, said “the combined annual salaries of all Australia’s vice-chancellors comprise about 2% of the government’s latest cuts to the university sector”.

“UQ has 52,000 students and is ranked in the top 50 of more than 10,000 universities globally. As a point of comparison, the University of Bath has 17,308 students enrolled.”

Source