Seoul Court to Rule on Samsung Scion Lee in Bribery Trial

Whatever Friday’s verdict, lawyers expect an appeal which could go all the way to the Supreme Court, with a final ruling probably next year.

Prosecutors have said Samsung’s contributions to two funds backed by Park aimed to secure government support for a merger of two of its affiliates to tighten Lee’s grip on the conglomerate. Lee has denied wrongdoing, and his lawyers say the 2015 merger was done on business merits.

Lee’s trial has gripped the nation, and Friday’s closed courtroom verdict will be witnessed mainly by lawyers and Samsung officials, as well as some 30 members of the public who won seats through a lottery.

Outside the Seoul Central District Court on Friday, hundreds of supporters of Lee and Park, mostly elderly, waved South Korean flags and shouted “Innocent! Release!” as they were watched on by teams of police, who parked police buses to shield the entrance of the court complex.

‘TOO BIG TO JAIL’

Samsung, founded in 1938 by Lee’s grandfather, is a household name in South Korea and a symbol of the country’s dramatic rise from poverty following the 1950-53 Korean War.

But over the years, it has also come to epitomize the cosy ties between politicians and powerful family-controlled business groups – or chaebols – which have been implicated in a series of corruption scandals.

South Koreans, who once applauded the chaebols for catapulting the country into a global economic power, now criticize them for holding back the economy and squeezing smaller businesses.

Investors say shares in chaebol firms trade at lower prices than they would otherwise because of their opaque corporate governance – the so-called Korea discount.

“Chaebol leaders used to get the same sentencing every time, there was even a saying called the ‘3-5 law’ – three years sentencing, five years probation,” said Park Sangin, professor of economics at Seoul National University.

“If Lee receives a heavy sentence, it can be seen as the shattering of the ‘too-big-to-jail’ trend of the past.”

Lee’s father was convicted of tax evasion in 2009, and had a 3-year sentence suspended, with judges citing his contribution to economic development and “patriotism through business enterprise from job creation”. He was pardoned four months after the final ruling.

South Korea’s new president, Moon Jae-in, who replaced the disgraced Park after a May 9 election, has pledged to rein in the chaebols, empower minority shareholders and end the practice of pardoning corporate tycoons convicted of white-collar crime.

The ruling is expected to affect the verdict in Park’s own corruption trial, expected later this year, as prosecutors argued she and Lee took part in the same act of bribery.

Prosecutors have also indicted top Samsung executives over the bribery scandal, including Choi Gee-sung, who headed the corporate strategy office, dubbed the ‘control tower’. It has since been disbanded, and Choi has resigned.

Experts were divided on how Friday’s ruling might go, with some lawyers expecting Lee to be found innocent on the major charges, saying much of the evidence at trial appeared circumstantial.

(Writing by Soyoung Kim; Editing by Ian Geoghegan, Robert Birsel)

Continue reading the main story

Source link